Samuel William has come to a decision ….
Vid from: http://youtu.be/-3N-_q3pVek
” Brought to you by ‘Truth You Can Wake Up To’.
A short film by Samuel William analysing the truth behind television licensing.
This film is intended as information and not guidance.
(update – this video was removed from youtube earlier this year because of eleged copyright infringement, I filed a counter-claim and won). “
See also: https://truthyoucanwakeupto.wordpress.com/
I’m reposting this (from: http://www.meetup.com/wearechangeleeds/messages/boards/thread/24834132/ by Sam Bamford).
Vid from: http://youtu.be/pXAgOWpB9Zk
Danny Bamping is: http://www.23acorns.com/profile-danny-bamping.html, http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/Entrepreneur-prepared-jail-tax-row/story-11726168-detail/story.html and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG7nxIUs6xM.
See the original article from:http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/roger-hayes-arrested-tried-secret-court-imprisoned
Via: http://www.nominedeus.co.uk/?p=1962
Back in early February 2012, Roger gave a talk on the Lawful Bank to Manchester We Are Change (see: https://escapeesblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/05/lawful-bank-presentation-2012-02-02-manchester/?preview=true&preview_id=2236&preview_nonce=8dd6025cf5).
At about 1:13:19 I stated obvious: “You’re the ringleader – THEY’ll do you in.”.
Well, it seems like THEY are trying to start the process.
I’ll write a summary if I get the chance.
Thanks to We Are Change Manchester.
From: http://youtu.be/p3YBZsStb0Y
Darren Deojee, of the Peoples Public Trust, addresses a meeting of Lawful Rebellion, held at Ashton FC in Ashton-in-Makerfield, on the 14th March 2012.
Darren asks if the Freeman and Sovereign movement has really thought through just what their end goals should be… plus a lot more besides.
http://www.Freedom-NorthWest.com, http://www.WeAreChangeManchester.com, http://www.lawfulrebellion.org.uk, http://www.PeoplesPublicTrust.com, http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/, http://www.lawfulbank.com/, http://www.ukcolumn.org/
The madness continues. One day, one day soon, we will bite back.
From: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/03/493571.html
The European Courts of Human Rights has ruled today that the UK police tactic of kettling protesters is lawful and does not infringe in article 5 of Convention on Human Rights – the right to liberty and security.
The judgement was based on a case brought before the courts by protesters who were kettled in Oxford Circus in central London for over seven hours during the 2001 Mayday anti-capitalist protests. More than 1,500 were detained without access to food water or toilet facilities by police for a fear of ‘beach of the peace’ despite there being no major outbreaks of violence during the day of protest.
Previously the police did not have the power to detain people against their will unless it was for arrest purposes. The European courts have now given the police the green light to deprive individuals of their liberty – even if they have done nothing illegal or committed a crime, for long periods of time under ‘public order’ tactics.
David Pannick QC, who represented the police argued “kettling” did not violate the human rights code. He said the code’s guarantee of liberty – except for individuals lawfully held in criminal matters – was not meant to concern “mere restrictions of movement”.
The court stated: “The police had imposed the cordon to isolate and contain a large crowd in dangerous and volatile conditions. This had been the least intrusive and most effective means to protect the public from violence. Although the police tried to start dispersing the crowd throughout the afternoon, they had been unable to do so as the danger had persisted.”
Adding: “Even by 2001, advances in communications technology had made it possible to mobilise protesters rapidly and covertly on a hitherto unknown scale. Article 5 did not have to be construed in such a way as to make it impracticable for the police to fulfil their duties of maintaining order and protecting the public.”
The judges voted 14-3 in favour of the police, re-enforcing the 2009 House of Lords verdict that kettling as a crowd control measure was “necessary, proportionate and lawful”.
It was the first time the court in Strasbourg had been asked to rule on kettling.
John Pilger (http://www.johnpilger.com) is a real journalist.
I remember, as a child watching John’s documentaries – certainly helped me understand the world.
From: http://vimeo.com/16962560
The following text is from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_omzLvbLVs
John Richard Pilger (born 9 October 1939) is an Australian journalist and documentary maker, based in London. He has twice won Britain’s Journalist of the Year Award, and his documentaries have received academy awards in Britain and the US.
Since his early years as a war correspondent in Vietnam, Pilger has been a strong critic of Western foreign policy. He is particularly opposed to many aspects of United States foreign policy, which he regards as being driven by an imperialist agenda
John Pilger Filmography:
John Pilger Awards include:
Via (with Thanks): http://www.newstruth.co.uk/lawful-disobedience-arrest-that-judge/
From: http://youtu.be/JEbCw8zKYos
” West Film Production Co’s condensed and CENSORED-FOR-TV version of what happened Monday 1pm 7th March 2011 in Hamilton Square, Birkenhead, England. This version will be screened on Sky Channel 201 early June. The full UNCENSORED version will be screened at the Kirkby Unemployed Centre, Liverpool in June and at the 4th Wirral International Film Festival in September. ”
I think this is part 2 of the set (from http://youtu.be/W1z5wFkZuvY):
” Part 2 End Credit Sequence of TV CENSORED version.
Set against the background of an almost total media blackout, this is the uncensored version of Kevin West’s award winning and highly controversial TV documentary about ordinary British people entering one of Her Majesty’s Law Courts in Birkenhead, UK and attempting to arrest the judge under the Magna Carta Chapter 61 for committing an act of treason. The people involved maintain that these courts are unlawful under Common Law (the highest law in the land) and that the judge in question (by doing so) is not acting under his Oath of Office and therefore guilty of treason. These are the same courts which daily penalize the UK people with all manner of fines, taxes, judgments and restrictions which do not form any part of Common Law. If proven the implications of this event for the entirety of the UK legal system is staggering. This film exposes the corporatization of the human being by the capitalist system at the expense of Natural and Common Law freedoms. “
Looks like Norman is an escapee and The Parasites That Be (TPTB) aren’t letting up.
Go, Norman, go!
From: https://justicefornormanscarth.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/police-seeking-the-fugitive-norman-scarth/
Police Seeking the Fugitive Norman Scarth
It is our understanding after attending his hearing recently where an arrest warrant was issued without bail, the ‘authorities’ are aware that Norman Scarth is out of the country.
The Police have decided to start doing house searches within the land mass known as England.
The first report of this is yesterday (12 03 12) at 08:15am when they knocked on the door of Tracey Zareie where it is reported by her via her facebook page entry later that day, that the Police carried out a search of her home in their relentless pursuit to capture the criminal mastermind Norman Scarth.
There is no evidence to support Norman Scarth being there, we can only assume that this is some sort of intimidation technique against those that have been keen observers, and there was an apparant warrant to search the premesis, although this may still be deemed as a breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which guarantees a person privacy in their home.
To be conducting house to house inquiries for an 86 year old man who was handing out leaflets, to find him and to lock him up, can only be looked on as some sort of bizarre persecution by the state considering that the ‘complainant’ is a Judge and a member of their club.
This also means that any ‘trial’ of Norman Scarth for handing out the leaflets is met with ‘bias’, this is a breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which provides in Law a guarantee of an ‘independent’ tribunal.
If it is found that any more homes are searched without warrants then complaints and Private Prosecutions may be taken out against any Police officer breaching a persons rights, being that we are all equal in Law.
On the same page, Tracey responds:
“Hi Uncle Norman,
I do hope u r ok, Have u found ur self suitable accommodation yet ??
Hope ur finding ur new surrounding interesting. Where ever you maybe I am sure it is better than here.
It is now after 1 am, managed to borrow Meena’s computer, lol
I had a visitor this morning, no sorry 3 VISITORS. They came to see me quite unexpected and uninvited. They brayed on my door at 8:15 this morning when I was fast asleep in my bed and was woken by the noise. I looked out my bedroom window ,only to see a police man looking back up at me. This set my heart racing, my first thought was ,Oh no not again. I put on my gown and made my way down stairs and found the key and unlocked the door. This is when I realised they were 3 of them.
They obviously knew who I was, asked if they could come in so I obliged, I think had I refused they would have come in anyway. They had a warrant to search my home. And no prizes for guessing who they were looking for, None other than Mr Norman Scarth, a little 86 year old man who had not attended court in Manchester 2 weeks earlier, I was informed by the officers that a warrant to arrest him without bail had been issued by the court for non attendance.
The officers looked around my home, in every room, even the cold damp cellar. I told them it was a waste of police time but some how I don’t think they agreed with me. After they questioned me about my association with Norman they said it would be better if I kept my distance from him, for my own good!!
They left and assured me that I should not be bothered again over this matter since they did not find Norman and no evidence to suggest he had been here.
I mentioned to them that I had still not been given my computer back from when they arrested me and came to my home without my knowledge while I was in custody. I must admit they did seem abit surprised and asked had I been charged with anything, I replied nothing all charges were dropped, they did not seem to understand why my computer was still being kept.
Not much more to add to this except, was told to tell you if I speak to u or know your whereabouts then to tell you to hand your self in.
Regards Tracey xxx”
According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKenzie_friend):
A McKenzie Friend assists a litigant in person in a common law court. This person does not need to be legally qualified. The crucial point is that litigants in person are entitled to have assistance, lay or professional, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
Their role was set out most clearly in the eponymous 1970 case McKenzie v. McKenzie. Although this role applies in the jurisdiction of England and Wales, it is regarded as having its origins in common law and hence has been adopted in practice in other common law jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States. Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area. He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person but are not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
In Leeds we have seen the use of McKenzie friend(s) (McKF) in the case of Norman Scarth. Now, McKFs have rallied together.
The following is from (with thanks): https://mckenzies4fairness.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/hello-world/
Via (with thanks): http://victims-unite.net/2012/03/10/operation-musa-activated-the-world-needs-to-know-what-happens-in-secret-family-courts-and-prisons/
This blog became necessary because too many victims of white collar crimes encountered too many problems and their helpers and supporters as well.
When victims are hit emotionally and financially, they are in front of a labyrinth of procedures and proceedings of professionals, organisations and authorities where friends can help and often become McKenzie Friends: lay legal advisors.
Helpers and supporters are ‘learning by doing’:
- to share what they’re learning about
- to advocate changes that are necessary
- to lobby for change via Parliamentary routes.
There have been others before us:
- www.McKenzie-Friend.co.uk
- www.SelfRepresentation.co.uk – Helping you to help yourself
- Help 4 LiPs
Brain Gerrish and Belinda Mckenzie give accounts of the proceedings (or the lack of).
Note the huge number of supports there.
From: http://youtu.be/pmNPK1RQK9Q
Brian Gerrish’s reaction to the Judgement by the Royal Courts of Justice against Hollie Greig. Bill Maloney asking the questions.
My quick notes:
3 judges.
No jury.
Judges leave for 7mins, then comes back to give a 40min verdict.
This is a show trial “a pre-ordained outcome was delivered to the public”. “It was theatre”.
It was show trial in order to bring the mother and the daughter back into the family court system to shut them up.
“The central issue of the abuse of Hollie Greig was not addressed!”.
On of the alleged abuse perpetrators was in court for some of the time.
The 3 judges were out to protect a fellow judge.
The judges were highly critical of the family.
The judicial system is utterly corrupt.
No media (inc. the BBC) were not there to report on this important case. Although 3 Sky News teams were there to cover a story about Ryan Giggs (footballer) and they refused to report on this large gathering.
John Hemming MP has called for the Head of the Family Law Division to stand down.
The judiciary will protect paedophiles if they are of high (enough) status.
The State is now attacking its own people.
Sarahl Teather (Families and Children’s Minister) is refusing to answer a Freedom Of Information request for an explanation of “her responsibility for marketing and commissioning of children’s services”.
Kent County Council has spent £100,000 in actively trafficking children out of this country.
Lawyers and Barrister have made £20,000,000 per year from child cases.
“Welcome to The Gestapo “
From: http://youtu.be/Kbvfek8UvPk
My quick notes:
Hollie (32 years old) has been deemed not to be competent (i.e. regarded as a child) and all of her evidence as a witness has been called into question.
Shropshire County Council will try to separate Hollie and her mother. They want to put Hollie into “care”.
Hollie will probably “disappear” because she has exposed the paedophiles at the top.
Other mothers have described themselves as been ‘hunted’ for the child by social services
There is an illusion created by the main stream media that paedophiles are ‘dirty old men’ (rather than within the higher echelons of society (judges, military, police, Lords, etc.).
The UKColumn office is receiving calls every week from parents who have had their child/ren stolen from them (using perjury, falsified court papers, lies, threats and intimidations). This is happening country wide.
A family moving to a different social services departments’ catchment area (i.e. moving to a different county) will still be hounded as these departments collaborate to hunt and track them.
Comparison of cases reveals a template type of events.
The British Government is stealing, trafficking and abusing children.
Politicians, by not challenging these issues are condoning child abuse.
In Hollie’s case, every MP has been informed. Only 1 MP, John Hemming, has taken up the issue. The remainder are condoning the abuse.
Robert Green has simply been ‘put out of the way’ although there no documentation to back up his arrest.
Two weeks prior to Robert Green’s imprisonment, a man who had 50,000 pornographic images of children was given community service.
Whistle-blowers (police officers, child services staff, etc.) are coming forward.
A recent police report on child abuse (on a national basis, and know to some MPs) has been secreted away.
Some whistle-blowers have reported similar scenarios in which cases been closed (involving senior members of society).
Paedophiles are operating the very services that are supposed to help children.
From: http://youtu.be/0eCmsgt7a4E
My quick notes:
27th March = Robert Green’s (66th) birthday.
Hollie Greig and her mother are appealing against Shropshire County Council’s (SCC) decision to have Hollie taken into ‘care’.
SCC thinks that Hollie does not have the capacity to litigate and decide how she wants to live her life.
Hollie disputes this.
Hollie’s words have not been heard in these proceedings.
Hollie is already under a court injunction not to speak publicaly.
Of 36 requests to provide ‘expert’ witnesses, none are willing to take this case and assess Hollie.
The judges did not deem that the case has been heard properly and referred the case back to the lower courts – where Hollie has already an official solicitor appointed (she can’t have her own legal representative) Her human right have been taken away from her.
Hollie wants to stay with her mother.
It appears that there’s a “politeness” in the procedure set up to get their intended result and give the impression that justice has been done.
Hollie will not be taken away from her mother!.
See also: http://holliedemandsjustice.org/content/press-release-and-summary-of-events-at-rcj-2nd-march2012/
Escapee's Blog 