RSS

Category Archives: Passport

You’ve Been Indefinitely Detained! Helpful Information From Your U.S. Government!


From: http://boingboing.net/2011/12/21/tom-the-dancing-bug-so-yo.html

You've Been Indefinitely Detained! Helpful Information From Your U.S. Government!

You've Been Indefinitely Detained! Helpful Information From Your U.S. Government!

 

In case a wasp takes offence


Never to beat about the bush, Old Holborn strikes again.

From: http://www.blottr.com/columnist/old-holborn/put-lid-back-jam

” Put the lid back on the Jam

Here we go again. The spectre of immigration is raising its ugly head again as the Head of the Border Agency is in deep politicial trouble for not inspecting the passports of non EU visitors to the UK with sufficient rigor and surprise surprise, the Nigerian in charge of vetting visas for the UK has been nicked for yes, you guessed it, handing out fake visas to Nigerians in return for bribes.

Now, 419 scammers aside, you do have to ask why so many still want to come to the UK. I’m pretty sure that if I could get a green card for the US or a visa for New Zealand, I’d would have been gone a long time ago. As it is, I’ve lived in various different countries in Europe and I can honestly say, hand on heart, I NEVER stowed away in lorry knowing that I could get free housing in Germany or sign on to welfare on arrival in France. I went because it suited my ambitions, paid well and stimulated my intellect to live in a different culture to my own.

Now ponder, if YOU heard of a land of milk and honey where instead of sitting under a tree all day surrounded by goats and civil war, you could receive free housing, free education, free medical care, not just for you but your entire family, for LIFE, would you risk everything to get here? Of course you would. Therein lies the problem with UK immigration. It is a pot of jam that no one has the courage to put the lid back on in case a wasp takes offence.

We NEED workers from abroad to do the work we pay our non workers not to do. Like it or not, a welfare system that can support a household of six to never do a days work is going to result in households of six never doing a days work. You and I both know plenty of people who have never worked and have not the slightest intention of working as long as they have access to benefits. Politicians can’t really address the issue because alas, those who take can also vote for the grinning politician who spouts he will introduce more taxes on those who do work to cover the benefits bill of those who won’t. They’ll huff and puff but none has the courage to say “if you can afford Sky TV at the expense of the taxpayer, we’ll deduct it from your benefits”.

Fine, we agree that we need foreign workers because our system is upside down. So we import workers and the fields get harvested, your plumbing gets fixed and a baby is delivered by a midwife from Mauritius. Everybody is happy. Then the wasps turn up to feast on the jam because we’ve left the lid off again.

An example. Britain now has 108,000 somali born immigrants, who used to sit under a tree, surrounded by goats and civil war. Now they sit under a British tree and chew Khat all day. Just 40% of Somali immigrant men work for a living whilst the rest reside on benefits – and here’s the point – because they can.

Please do not misinterpret this statment as racist or nationalisitic. I have no problem with anybody coming to the UK and sitting under a tree and chewing Khat all day as long as they are not asking me to finance it in any way. But they are. There are queues at Sangatte in Northern France of people desperately trying to get to the UK in the back of a truck to do exactly that. I can’t blame them, wouldn’t you too if the chance was there?

So now a new plan to limit migrant workers to only those earning above £35,000 has been hatched to cover those who we actually need (scientists, engineers etc.,) but STILL nobody dare put the lid back on the jam jar. Certainly, those earning over £35K were never going to be a drain on the welfare system anyway, so in reality, nothing has changed – at all.

What would be so wrong with simply stating that if you cannot support yourself and your family, then it is not acceptable to demand your chosen host nation do it for you on arrival? I’m loathe enough to do it for born and bred cockneys, let alone someone whose only life skill is cuddling an AK47 in the desert or hand ploughing with a water buffalo. If you can show me a business plan that says you will add value to society by busking with panpipes on the Tube, unfinanced by the taypayer, then I’m all ears, jump aboard, but with the Council no longer hiring Urdu Outreach facilitators or “cultural awareness coordinators”, the chances of you not being a burden to me and my fellow citizens are slim. And frankly, we have enough of our own home grown burdens currently glued to the Jeremy Kyle show to even think about having it translated into 27 other languages at our cost.

Now then, who do I need to bribe to get a visa for Utopia? ”

 

Denial of Consent to Register Children


Wow, this is good!

This is a sanitised process used by my partner and I to deny our consent to register the births of our children.

NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following today’s receipt of your letter dated 07 May 2010, the contents of which are hereby refused for cause without dishonour; please find enclosed a DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN.

We trust this presentment brings this matter to a swift and efficient conclusion. Kindly update your records accordingly.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Declaration of Denial of Consent to Register Children

Strictly Private & Confidential

We, the authorized representatives for the legal persons, FATHER’S STRAWMAN and MOTHER’S STRAWMAN, do hereby declare that the following is a Verified Plain Statement of the Facts as we perceive them.

Let it be known by all concerned, interested and affected parties that:

1. We have been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over our children by the Creator of the Universe.
2. We have accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over our children’s well-being and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. For and on behalf of our children, we have settled their entire legal estate into a private trust which is administered for their maximum benefit.
4. The property settled into said private trust includes (without limitation) any and all information pertaining to the existence of our children, strictly precluding the disclosure of the details of their birth to any party whatsoever.
5. Any and all disclosures of information pertaining to the existence of our children would represent a breach of the aforementioned private trust and all those parties responsible for said breaches will be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. We do not recognise or consent to any perceived obligation, whether statutory or otherwise, to register the births of our children, under any circumstances whatsoever.
7. As Trustees of the aforementioned private trust, we affirm, jointly and without division that we refuse to grant our consent and/or authorisation to the Registrar or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register information pertaining to the birth of our children, under any circumstances whatsoever.

DECLARATION
We, the undersigned, hereby affirm that, to the very best of our knowledge, the entirety of the foregoing is true, correct and not misleading, In the geographical area known as ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME, England, this declaration is autographed, sealed and date-stamped by the Post Office, on the tenth day of the month of May, in the year known as two thousand and ten AD (Dwapara 310 – ascending).

By: __________________________________FATHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

By: _________________________________MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

Needless to say, the Registra took exception to our declaration and sent us an aggressive notice threatening prosecution if our persons failed to comply, in response to which we sent the following missive._

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED
REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS
CIVIC CENTRE
ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME
N66 6XL

27 MAY 2010
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following receipt of your notice dated 24 May 2010 and pursuant to the enclosed NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT; I hereby serve NOTICE OF CONDITIIONAL ACCEPTANCE. Wherefore, MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN agree to register the births of their children in the most expedient manner possible, upon receipt of the following items:
1. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over their children by the Creator of the Universe.
2. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over their children’s well-being and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. Material evidence demonstrating that the information requested has not been settled into a private trust, precluding the disclosure of any and all details of their children’s births to any third party whatsoever.
4. Material evidence demonstrating that all disclosures of information pertaining to the existence of their children would not represent a breach of the aforementioned private trust, as well as the Laws of Equity.
5. Material evidence demonstrating that all those parties responsible for said breaches would not be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have consented to the statutory ‘duty’ prescribed by the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953, without which no sustainable cause of action for prosecution can arise.
7. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not unequivocally denied their consent and/or authorisation to the Registrar and/or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register information pertaining to the birth of their children, under any circumstances whatsoever.
8. Material evidence demonstrating that your statement that a “female child was born to… [MOTHER’S STRAWMAN] …on or about DATE OF BIRTH” does not represent two clear breaches of trust by the Registrar of Births and Deaths.
9. Material evidence demonstrating that any and all attempts to enforce statutes upon persons who have not consented to perform under said instruments would not represent fundamental breaches of international human rights laws, as well as the Laws of Nature.
Please find enclosed a certified copy of the DECLARATION OF DENIAL OF CONSENT TO REGISTER CHILDREN dated 10 May 2010, delivered to your office by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery on 12 May 2010. In good faith, we look forward to receiving the foregoing reasonably requested substance within seven (7) days of your receipt of this notice. Failure to deliver an appropriate response will result in the lawful presumption that the non-negotiable conditions cannot be met and that your request has been duly withdrawn, with no further action required.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

A reply [of sorts] was sent by the Registra, in the form of an almost identical notice, to which we responded in kind.

STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED, REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS
CIVIC CENTRE
ANNUITY-UPON-CRIME
N66 6XL

16 June 2010
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DISHONOUR

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear CAROLINE SHORT-TEMPERED,

Following receipt of your letter dated 11 June 2010, the contents of which are refused for cause on the basis that you have failed to respond appropriately to the NOTICE OF CONDITIIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated 27 May 2010; for and on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN, I hereby serve NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DISHONOUR.

Wherefore, in good faith, MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN agree to register the births of their children in the most expedient manner possible, upon receipt of the following items:
1. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not been granted irrevocable superior guardianship rights over their children by the Creator of the Universe.
2. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not accepted irrevocable Power of Attorney over their children’s well-being and property until the eighteenth anniversary of their birth.
3. Material evidence demonstrating that the information requested has not been settled into a private trust, precluding the disclosure of any and all details of their children’s births to any third party whatsoever, unless that action is of significant benefit to the beneficiaries.
4. Material evidence demonstrating that all disclosures of information pertaining to the existence of their children would not represent a breach of the aforementioned private trust, as well as the Laws of Equity.
5. Material evidence demonstrating that all those parties responsible for said breaches would not be liable for charges of THIRTY THOUSAND POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United Kingdom) per occurrence.
6. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have consented to the statutory ‘duty’ prescribed by the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953, without which no sustainable cause of action for prosecution can arise.
7. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN have not unequivocally denied their consent and/or authorisation to the Registrar and/or any other individual, organization or legal entity, to register information pertaining to the birth of their children.
8. Material evidence demonstrating that your statement that a “female child was born to… [MOTHER’S STRAWMAN] …on or about DATE OF BIRTH” does not represent two clear breaches of trust by the Registrar of Births and Deaths.
9. Material evidence demonstrating that MOTHER’S STRAWMAN good faith presentment of a conditional acceptance of the unsubstantiated statutory obligation does not comprise a response delivered in “a positive manner”.
10. Material evidence demonstrating that, in accordance to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and pursuant to the NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT dated 27 May 2010, the Registrar of Births and Deaths has not incurred default charges of FIFTEEN HUNDRED POUNDS STERLING (or functional currency of the United Kingdom).
11. Material evidence demonstrating that the children of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN and FATHER’S STRAWMAN will benefit significantly from the registration of their births.
12. Material evidence demonstrating that, in stating “your daughter will face considerable difficulties in the future if she does not have a birth certificate” in your letter of 11 June 2010, the Registrar of Births and Deaths has not breached the Malicious Communication Act 1988.
13. Material evidence demonstrating that any and all attempts to enforce statutes upon persons who have not consented to perform under said instruments would not represent fundamental breaches of international human rights laws, as well as the Laws of Nature.
In good faith, MOTHER’S STRAWMAN looks forward to receiving the foregoing reasonably requested substance within seven (7) days of your receipt of this notice. Failure to deliver an appropriate response will result in the lawful presumption that the non-negotiable conditions cannot be met and that your request has been duly withdrawn, with no further action required.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Three months after our daughter’s birth, the Home Office sent a letter confirming that no further action would be taken, but not without attempting to convince us that obtaining a passport and a place at a state school would be extremely difficult for her because of the position we have taken.

Thus far, we have had no need to take our daughter to the local NHS surgery, but her name is privately registered with the practice for the purposes of dealing with any situation which necessitates a visit to the doctor. This was offered by our family GP without any fuss when it was established that our daughter’s birth had not been registered.

We also wasted no time in applying for a passport from the Home Office, in support of which we sent the Certificate of Birth Record we created ourselves, along with the following notice.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

28 JULY 2010
NOTICE OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

In my capacity as agent for my partner, MOTHER’S STRAWMAN; following receipt of your letter dated 09 July 2010 requesting a “Full Birth (or Full Adoption) Certificate or equivalent”, please find enclosed a Certificate of Birth Record for our daughter.

We fully understand the unusual nature of this presentment, which nevertheless provides the IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE with all the necessary information to determine the unequivocal eligibility of our daughter for a UNITED KINGDOM PASSPORT: the name of the applicant; details and evidence of the place and date of her birth; evidence of the UK citizenship of her parents.

We acknowledge the fact that we have chosen not to register the birth of our children, since we are of the heartfelt belief that to do so would not be in their best interests, but we are also acutely aware that this enclosure more than adequately demonstrates our daughter’s entitlement to UNITED KINGDOM citizenship, whilst the right of all subjects [citizens] to travel to and from any port or place within those territories considered “Her Majesty’s dominions” is clearly prescribed by statute in the Union with Scotland Act 1706, for the purposes of which the issue of a passport is generally required.

Wherefore, in good faith, we trust this presentment meets with all reasonable requirements and look forward to receiving a UNITED KINGDOM PASSPORT for our daughter in due course. Should you have any questions or queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Without malice, mischief, ill-will, frivolity or vexation; in sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice
Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Predictably enough, the I&P Office wrote back claiming that the Certificate of Birth Record was not sufficient evidence of our daughter’s right to a UK Passport, but they did concede that the application would be successful if we complied with the specific requirements stipulated by the Home Office.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

17 SEPTEMBER 2010

NOTICE OF FURTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

Following receipt of your letter dated 25/08/2010, in relation to the issue of a passport for DAUGHTER’S STRAWMAN; for and on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN, as requested, please find enclosed the following documents:

a. Letter dated 04/06/2010 from the partners of LOCAL SURGERY, with regard to our daughter’s six week development check, which was subsequently done by FAMILY DOCTOR at the address below.
b. Letter from the General Register Office dated 21 July 2010, clearly stating that our daughter’s birth has not been registered.

Since this presentment would seem to meet the requirements outlined in your letter of the 25th of August, we look forward to receiving our daughter’s passport within seven (7) days of your receipt of this notice, as it our intention to travel abroad shortly after that date.

In sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Shortly afterwards we received another letter, this time stating that the letter from the partners of our local surgery did not comply with the strict requirements for the information for a successful application, to which we replied with the following notice.

MR CHRISTOPHER DIDDLE
BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER
IDENTITY & PASSPORT SERVICE
PO BOX 666

21 October 2010

NOTICE OF FURTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

Dear MR DIDDLE,

As requested, please find enclosed a letter from our family doctor, confirming that our daughter was born on DATE OF BIRTH at PLACE OF BIRTH, and that she has lived with us at the address below since her birth, where FAMILY DOCTOR has performed two physical examinations.

Since this presentment would seem to meet the requirements discussed, we look forward to receiving our daughter’s passport in due course. Many thanks.

In sincerity and honour,

By: FATHER’S STRAWMAN™
For & on behalf of MOTHER’S STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

Fourteen days later, the documents we submitted with the application were returned, along with a note confirming that the application was being processed. The passport arrived in the post the following morning, thus demonstrating that the Home Office has no legal recourse to deny a passport to an unregistered child, provided that the right to UK citizenship can be demonstrated with a simple letter from the family doctor or a statutory declaration by an individual who has firsthand knowledge of the time and place of birth.

It is a wonderful feeling to know that our daughter’s future sweat equity has not been pledged to the Crown, in return for a Birth Certificate and the dwindling benefit priviledges of the failing Welfare State. It is also reassuring to know that the government do not have the jurisdiction to interfere in our daughter’s life.

Until such time that we manage to obtain a Diplomatic Family Passport, a security agreement on loan from HMQ will be more than sufficient for our short-term international travel purposes.

From: http://freetheplanet.net/articles/177/denial-of-consent-to-register-children-new-post

 
 
%d bloggers like this: