Here’s the trailer for the Ripple Effect 2. The full film will be released on the 7th anniversary of that fateful day –7th July 2012 (Saturday).
Direct link: http://jforjustice.net/77re2.html).
I am supporter of The Royal Park Community Consortium (RPCC). We’re a group of local (Leeds) residents who have been trying to get the Leeds City Council to hand over a disused school to the local community for a clearly-defined community & business centre.
As you’d expect, The Parasites That Be have, not only tried to drag their feet in the process, but actively tried to allow the building to rot to such an extent that it would have needed to be demolished – thereby justifying the sale of the land to developer(s) for even more flats and yet another supermarket.
The local community (which off course includes students) together with the University Student Unions have made it very clear that we do not need or want the council’s offerings. We want and need a community facility. We will pay for it. We will carry out the works. We will run it.
The next meeting will be held on:
” Royal Park Community Consortium remains in dialogue with Leeds city council and is trying to acquire the redundant school building and accomplish a community led refurbishment to use the building as a Hyde Park community asset. The group will be looking out for individuals and firms to help accomplish this in a “Big Society” effort. A team of volunteers are planning to contact tradesmen willing to offer some time to give to the project and various firms who would be willing to donate materials to get the project accepted by our Labour led city council.
It is probable that large timbers will be needed to repair the roof along with lead to replace the missing strips taken some 3 years ago. To get the building water and wind proof is the first objective so windows will also be a priority then to re-establish the ground and first floors. When all that is safe the insides can be tackled and gradually brought back into use. Because of the water damage and vandalism that has taken place all sorts of building materials, timber, cable, plaster, plumbing items will be needed and of course the tradesmen to guide the process.
There is a caretakers house that, after inspection, should be able to be brought back into use in 8 weeks or so as it is mostly in reasonable condition. The house might be used as the centre of operations or let out to give the site mores security should the project be sanctioned by the council.
Once we have a list of offers and materials the group will make out a plan and present it to the council for their consideration.
The big question is ~ What can you pledge?”
The Pledge form:
Company limited by Guarantee No. 6929678
RPCC ~ Charity No.1144373
The Big Royal Park School Community
Royal Park Community Consortium remains in dialogue with Leeds city council and is trying to acquire the redundant school building and accomplish a community led refurbishment to have the building as a Hyde Park community asset.
We are asking for pledges of Materials and Time to support this. The project requires all sorts of building materials, timber; cable, plaster etc and the tradesmen to guide the process.
What can you pledge
Time? Number of Hours ………………………. Days ………………….
TICK here~ Per Week ……. Per Month ……… Total amount ……
Material (or Value) Eg. …….……………………….……………………….
Company Name ……………………….
Royal Park Community Consortium
Stephen Henderson from Kent Freedom Movement tells us of the benefits.
… I thought the Lawful Bank meeting last Thursday was the best I’ve seen so far and the strongest when it comes to offering a realistic alternative to the system. I think that the Lawful Bank provides the ground work for this movement because it gives it credibility and shows the public that we are not just trying to expose how corrupt the system is but to rather show them a different way we can live. If we are going up against the well-planned, well-organised and well-presented New World Order we need to counter that by becoming a well-planned, well-organised and well-presented alternative so that the masses can look at us and take this movement seriously.
The Lawful Bank can offer the platform for a new type of government or plan that can be accepted by the public and can eventually make the Monarchy and the Houses of Parliament insignificant. Now in regards to the Kent Freedom Movement I feel we have a huge part to play in making this a reality and with the great work Deborah, Chris and the rest are doing I have no doubt this movement will become unstoppable. I was speaking with fellow KFM member Tom a couple of weeks ago and we thought that to take the movement to the next level that we as a group should start to set up a ‘KFM Council’ which I will explain more in my next blog which will really get into how it would work. I have a lot of faith in this movement and I hope to become a key part of this group from which I’m going to try and dedicate as my time as I can to this because although we maybe the minority, its only the minority who are remembered throughout history and I know that we will all take are place in history as those who defeated the New World Order !
I’ll be there and will report back.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 7:30 PM,
Headingley Enterprise and Arts Centre (HEART), Bennett Road, LS6 3HN
This will be a Law workshop, so bring your pens and paper and it will be about the way the Court operates and also most importantly there will be the procedures given for anyone to bring forward a prosecution through the Magistrates Court and if we have time how to bring forward a Writ of Habeas Corpus for a Prisoner locked up UNLAWFULLY very important to our constitution, we do have one it is just written in Legislation in various segments. Hope to see you there. As this event is provided free a suggested donation of £1 will be asked to contribute towards the tea and coffee fund, as these facilities will be available. Knowledge is free, please share it, peace, love and joy to all x
Received this via email.
Following my recent discussions with knowledgeable individuals, it appears that ‘Family Trusts’ are a way of protecting us from The State.
See Chris’ site (http://thejarvisfamily.me/) for a lot for info.
Go Chris, go.
In modern language usage, brought about by use within the Courts, the word “care“, has become synonymous with the word “custody“.
A family is a group. The taking of children and moving them from one group to another is prohibited by UK and International Law, this is evidenced by the provision in UK Statute Law – “International Criminal Court Act 2001 – Schedule 8 – Article 6 – Genocide (e) forcible transferring children of the group to another group”
There is a forthcoming prosecution against Leeds City Council, due to evidence becoming available of the Body Corporate acting outside of any Lawful Jurisdiction, in its aim of creating a financial gain for itself, by creating a loss elsewhere, this is recognised and protected from in Law via the Fraud Act 2006.
Leeds City Council Corporate Body contains departments within. Individual departments receive money, some for the custody of children.
If Leeds City Council departments do not spend their full budget within each financial term, they may not be eligible for a full budget the following term, if they do spend their budget, or go over budget they may become eligible for a full or increased budget the following term.
This is a target driven by money.
We intend to clearly show, using more than one example of children being removed from families, that the process Leeds City Council have used in certain circumstances has been for their own gain, and outside of any accepted Lawful process.
Leeds City Council have been hiring the use of Circuit Judges and District Judges to sit in what looks like a Court environment, but is in effect only a room with an arbitrator, deceiving desperate parents in an attempt to take their children from them in order to fulfil their quotas.
What Leeds City Council has been doing, has nothing to do with Lawful process, or safety.
Notices of fault have been issued along with Notices of intended prosecution to relevant parties.
What we are doing is historic, and is in the Wider Public Interest, to uphold the Law.
We are all equal in Law.
Find out more information here: http://thejarvisfamily.me
For further information please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
Go, Norman, go!
Police Seeking the Fugitive Norman Scarth
It is our understanding after attending his hearing recently where an arrest warrant was issued without bail, the ‘authorities’ are aware that Norman Scarth is out of the country.
The Police have decided to start doing house searches within the land mass known as England.
The first report of this is yesterday (12 03 12) at 08:15am when they knocked on the door of Tracey Zareie where it is reported by her via her facebook page entry later that day, that the Police carried out a search of her home in their relentless pursuit to capture the criminal mastermind Norman Scarth.
There is no evidence to support Norman Scarth being there, we can only assume that this is some sort of intimidation technique against those that have been keen observers, and there was an apparant warrant to search the premesis, although this may still be deemed as a breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which guarantees a person privacy in their home.
To be conducting house to house inquiries for an 86 year old man who was handing out leaflets, to find him and to lock him up, can only be looked on as some sort of bizarre persecution by the state considering that the ‘complainant’ is a Judge and a member of their club.
This also means that any ‘trial’ of Norman Scarth for handing out the leaflets is met with ‘bias’, this is a breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which provides in Law a guarantee of an ‘independent’ tribunal.
If it is found that any more homes are searched without warrants then complaints and Private Prosecutions may be taken out against any Police officer breaching a persons rights, being that we are all equal in Law.
On the same page, Tracey responds:
“Hi Uncle Norman,
I do hope u r ok, Have u found ur self suitable accommodation yet ??
Hope ur finding ur new surrounding interesting. Where ever you maybe I am sure it is better than here.
It is now after 1 am, managed to borrow Meena’s computer, lol
I had a visitor this morning, no sorry 3 VISITORS. They came to see me quite unexpected and uninvited. They brayed on my door at 8:15 this morning when I was fast asleep in my bed and was woken by the noise. I looked out my bedroom window ,only to see a police man looking back up at me. This set my heart racing, my first thought was ,Oh no not again. I put on my gown and made my way down stairs and found the key and unlocked the door. This is when I realised they were 3 of them.
They obviously knew who I was, asked if they could come in so I obliged, I think had I refused they would have come in anyway. They had a warrant to search my home. And no prizes for guessing who they were looking for, None other than Mr Norman Scarth, a little 86 year old man who had not attended court in Manchester 2 weeks earlier, I was informed by the officers that a warrant to arrest him without bail had been issued by the court for non attendance.
The officers looked around my home, in every room, even the cold damp cellar. I told them it was a waste of police time but some how I don’t think they agreed with me. After they questioned me about my association with Norman they said it would be better if I kept my distance from him, for my own good!!
They left and assured me that I should not be bothered again over this matter since they did not find Norman and no evidence to suggest he had been here.
I mentioned to them that I had still not been given my computer back from when they arrested me and came to my home without my knowledge while I was in custody. I must admit they did seem abit surprised and asked had I been charged with anything, I replied nothing all charges were dropped, they did not seem to understand why my computer was still being kept.
Not much more to add to this except, was told to tell you if I speak to u or know your whereabouts then to tell you to hand your self in.
Regards Tracey xxx”
According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKenzie_friend):
A McKenzie Friend assists a litigant in person in a common law court. This person does not need to be legally qualified. The crucial point is that litigants in person are entitled to have assistance, lay or professional, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
Their role was set out most clearly in the eponymous 1970 case McKenzie v. McKenzie. Although this role applies in the jurisdiction of England and Wales, it is regarded as having its origins in common law and hence has been adopted in practice in other common law jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States. Although in many cases a McKenzie friend may be an actual friend, it is often somebody with knowledge of the area. He or she may be liable for any misleading advice given to the litigant in person but are not covered by professional indemnity insurance.
In Leeds we have seen the use of McKenzie friend(s) (McKF) in the case of Norman Scarth. Now, McKFs have rallied together.
The following is from (with thanks): https://mckenzies4fairness.wordpress.com/2012/02/03/hello-world/
This blog became necessary because too many victims of white collar crimes encountered too many problems and their helpers and supporters as well.
When victims are hit emotionally and financially, they are in front of a labyrinth of procedures and proceedings of professionals, organisations and authorities where friends can help and often become McKenzie Friends: lay legal advisors.
Helpers and supporters are ‘learning by doing’:
- to share what they’re learning about
- to advocate changes that are necessary
- to lobby for change via Parliamentary routes.
There have been others before us:
To ordinary police constables: I do not hate you. I do not want to fight with you. I have respect for your common law oaths and for your work. Without you, our communities will descend into chaos. Can you see how you are being used by your ‘superiors’ as pawns in their games? Games which threaten your fellow humans’ liberty. Games which will eventually be used against you. When the time comes, you will have to make a choice – will you protecting us or oppressing us?
This is about the plight of Norman Scarth, due in at Manchester Magistrates Court on the 23rd February, he needs help people, let’s not forget 86 year old Norman. https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1074274091 – created at http://goanimate.com/
Further to my recent post “Norman Scarth: Court date 2012-01-12 UPDATE” (https://escapeesblog.wordpress.com/2011/12/28/norman-scarth-court-date-2012-01-12-update/), We Are Change Manchester have produced the following vid.
” On the 12th of January 2012, Norman Scarth made yet another appearance at Leeds Magistrates for the evil crimes of using a Megaphone and handing out some leaflets.
West Yorkshire Police have made his life a living hell by hounding this 86 year old war veteran from his sheltered housing through to the corrupt judicial system.
But Norman, who served on the Arctic Convoys during the 2nd World war, is not the type of chap to bow down to a corrupt system and he is as determined as ever to fight for freedom and justice…no matter the odds. “
Further to an earlier post “Tomorrow another child will be stolen by the council” (https://escapeesblog.wordpress.com/2012/01/02/tomorrow-another-child-will-be-stolen-by-the-council/), Chris has got some feedback for us:
” The Judge decided to kick two of us out who were “not party to proceedings”.
Not before I made an application and told the Judge that we were there representing the Wider Public Interest, he then panicked, got up, to scuttle off, before he managed to leave the ‘room’. I declared that he was committing Treason, and that the ‘Trial’ did not meet with Article 6 standards of the Human Rights Act. If we were to leave because Article 6 declares that all hearings must be fair and available to the Public and if they are to be private then at least the first instance must be in Public.
What I did not address him on was the Common Law aspect, this was because he got up to leave as I was speaking to him. Under Common Law, which sits above all other Law the man’s right was to be tried before a Jury of his peers and not to be disinherited, which means that you cannot remove someones children in Law full stop, they have to give them away.
Forced Contracting is also Unlawful too.”
More info as it appears.