Category Archives: Magna Carta

Roger Hayes: Update from Danny Bamping (2012-07-05)

I’m reposting this (from: by Sam Bamford).

Vid from:

Danny Bamping is:, and


Police Privatisation 999


Question: If the privatisation of the Police goes through, will we still have to ‘co-operate’ with them?

Video from:

“On May 17 Surrey and West Midlands police forces announced they were putting plans to push through privatisation worth £1.5 billion on hold until after the Olympics, when they would hold a public consultation. The plans have been put on hold because of stiff public opposition.

A survey carried out for Unite revealed that nearly 80 per cent of people polled in the West Midlands didn’t realise their police services were up for sale. The union had blamed WMP for trying to rush through the plans. Unite is warning that if West Midlands Police is eventually privatised it could begin a snowball effect with police forces selling off services to private companies across England and Wales.”



Iceland: How The People Defeated The E.U. And Bankers


In Iceland, the people has made the government resign, the primary banks have been nationalized, it was decided to not pay the debt that these created with Great Britain and Holland due to their bad financial politics and a public assembly has been created to rewrite the constitution.

And all of this in a peaceful way. A whole revolution against the powers that have created the current global crisis. This is why there hasn’t been any publicity during the last two years: What would happen if the rest of the EU citizens took this as an example?


  • 2008. The main bank of the country is nationalized. The Krona, the currency of Iceland devalues and the stock market stops. The country is in bankruptcy
  • 2008. The citizens protest in front of parliament and manage to get new elections that make the resignation of the prime minister and his whole government. The country is in bad economic situation. A law proposes paying back the debt to Great Britain and Holland through the payment of 3,500 million euros, which will be paid by the people of Iceland monthly during the next 15 years, with a 5.5% interest.
  • 2010. The people go out in the streets and demand a referendum. In January 2010 the president denies the approval and announces a popular meeting. In March the referendum and the denial of payment is voted in by 93%. Meanwhile the government has initiated an investigation to bring to justice those responsible for the crisis, and many high level executives and bankers are arrested. The Interpol dictates an order that make all the implicated parties leave the country.

In this crisis an assembly is elected to rewrite a new Constitution which can include the lessons learned from this, and which will substitute the current one (a copy of the Danish Constitution).

25 citizens are chosen, with no political affiliation, out of the 522 candidates. For candidacy all that was needed was to be an adult and have the support of 30 people. The constitutional assembly starts in February of 2011 to present the ‘carta magna’ from the recommendations given by the different assemblies happening throughout the country. It must be approved by the current Parliament and by the one constituted through the next legislative elections.

So in summary of the Icelandic revolution:

  • resignation of the whole government
  • nationalization of the bank.
  • referendum so that the people can decide over the economic decisions.
  • incarcerating the responsible parties
  • rewriting of the constitution by its people

Have we been informed of this through the media? Has any political program in radio or TV commented on this?


The Icelandic people have been able to show that there is a way to beat the system and has given a democracy lesson to the world.


Birkenhead 2011-03-07: Great new vid

Via (with Thanks):


” West Film Production Co’s condensed and CENSORED-FOR-TV version of what happened Monday 1pm 7th March 2011 in Hamilton Square, Birkenhead, England. This version will be screened on Sky Channel 201 early June. The full UNCENSORED version will be screened at the Kirkby Unemployed Centre, Liverpool in June and at the 4th Wirral International Film Festival in September. ”

I think this is part 2 of the set (from

” Part 2 End Credit Sequence of TV CENSORED version.

Set against the background of an almost total media blackout, this is the uncensored version of Kevin West’s award winning and highly controversial TV documentary about ordinary British people entering one of Her Majesty’s Law Courts in Birkenhead, UK and attempting to arrest the judge under the Magna Carta Chapter 61 for committing an act of treason. The people involved maintain that these courts are unlawful under Common Law (the highest law in the land) and that the judge in question (by doing so) is not acting under his Oath of Office and therefore guilty of treason. These are the same courts which daily penalize the UK people with all manner of fines, taxes, judgments and restrictions which do not form any part of Common Law. If proven the implications of this event for the entirety of the UK legal system is staggering. This film exposes the corporatization of the human being by the capitalist system at the expense of Natural and Common Law freedoms. “


Finding the Freemen – CBC News Propaganda

The Parasites That Be are getting scared – CBS are having to generate more lies for the masses.





Private Conveyance Notice

They don’t like it up ‘um.
This is quite nice (though the penalties are way too low).

Many thanks to:

My text:


U.K. Common Law Jurisdiction



Any person/persons including, but NOT limited to:

  • ‘Civil Enforcement Officers’ (CEOs),
  • DVLA Officers and/or their 3rd Party Agents,
  • ‘Police Community Support Officers’ (PCSOs),
  • ‘Private Revenue Collection Officers’ (PRCOs),
  • ‘Traffic Wardens’

who film, photograph or attach anything to this private conveyance, including but NOT limited to;

  • ‘Parking Notices’,
  • ‘Penalty Charge Notices’ (PCNs) &
  • ‘Wheel Clamps’

for the purposes of generating revenue will thereby be entering into a contract with us therein agreeing to the term & conditions of said contract including but NOT limited to; The Fee Schedule as detailed herein;

  1. You agree to pay £666 (six hundred and sixty six) for each notice that is attached / issued to this private conveyance *.
  2. You agree to pay £666 (six hundred and sixty six) for each image / photograph that you take of this private conveyance *.
  3. If you clamp this private conveyance you thereby agree to pay £666 (six hundred and sixty six) per hour or part thereof until the clamp is removed *.
  4. If you move, relocate or tow this private conveyance you thereby agree to pay £666 (six hundred and sixty six) per hour or part thereof until the private conveyance is returned to me, it’s lawful owner *.

* In addition to items 1, 2, 3 & 4 you are liable without limitation for any damage to this private conveyance. It is a punishable Common Law Offence to cause harm, injury or loss to another human &/or their property.


Trial by Jury under threat at magistrate ‘courts’

The idea reported upon in the following article is, of course illegal – see Magna Carta 29: ” No freeman is to be taken or imprisoned or disseised of his free tenement or of his liberties or free customs, or outlawed or exiled or in any way ruined, nor will we go against such a man or send against him save by lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land. To no-one will we sell or deny of delay right or justice.

Remember: Lawful is different to being Legal.

This has nothing to do with saving money. This is a way of further trying to enslaving us! Can you smell the coffee?


Government ‘considers cutting defendant rights to jury trial’

Impressed with speedy post-riots justice, ministers consider cash-saving measure, according to Magistrates’ Association.

By Owen Bowcott, Monday 16 January 2012 11.04 GMT

Some defendants could lose their right to be tried in front of a jury at crown court.

Ministers are considering restricting defendants’ ability to choose jury trial in less serious offences, according to the Magistrates’ Association.

The proposal, supported by magistrates, is being advocated as one element in the Ministry of Justice’s cash-saving drive, building on lessons learned from processing offenders following last summer’s riots.

Cases known as “either way offences”, where the accused can opt for trial in a magistrates court or in front of a jury at crown court, are most likely to be affected.

Such cases usually involve relatively low-value thefts, such as shoplifting, or minor cases of criminal damage.

Ministers have been impressed with the speed with which justice was dispensed after August’s riots. A white paper on developments to be adopted following the riots is being drawn up by the Ministry of Justice; its contents have not yet been finalised.

The attorney general, Dominic Grieve, has suggested that magistrates might be given greater sentencing powers, increasing the maximum term they might be able to impose from six to 12 months for a single offence.

But the Ministry of Justice played down reports of a review of trial procedures, saying: “There are no plans to remove trial by jury. We are looking at ways of improving how courts respond quickly and efficiently to crime and disorder. No ministerial decisions have been made. However we are clear that trial by jury will stay.”

Trials at crown court cost more than three times as much as in the lower courts.

Criminal barristers and human rights groups are likely to be worried by an erosion of what is seen as a fundamental liberty.

John Fassenfelt JP, chairman of the Magistrates Association, said that he believes ministers are actively considering how to reduce the number of “either way offences”. He said: “It’s one we have suggested they could save an awful lot of money on.”

The Magistrates’ Association added: “It’s being considered in the light of the riots. It’s something we have been concerned about for a while. Particularly for theft where someone might nick a bottle of wine and then elect to go for crown court trial. That costs a lot of money.”

David Cameron has been an enthusiastic supporter of the right to trial by jury. In 2007, he even suggested that it might formally be incorporated into legislation. “Things like the right to trial by jury, that’s not actually in the European Convention, but maybe that’s something we should have in a British Bill of Rights,” he said in a radio interview.

%d bloggers like this: