Which person, in the eyes of the law, am I? Russell Porisky asked the judge

21 Jan

The Parasites That Be (TPTB) are getting scared. They don’t know, and they don’t care about The Law in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

From: Vancouver Sun (2012-01-19) (

Russ Porisky

Chilliwack’s Russell Porisky has been convicted of counselling people to evade taxes through his school, Paradigm Education Group.

B.C. Supreme Court judge Elliott Myers also convicted Porisky and his common-law wife of failing to report a total of $1,127,185 of income derived from the school during the five-year period ending December 2008, thereby evading $225,222 in income tax.

The judge further convicted Porisky of failing to remit $66,133 in goods and services taxes that he should have collected on the sale of Paradigm courses and materials.

For years, Porisky has been promoting his “natural person” theory, which holds that a per-son can arrange his or her business affairs to receive income as a “natural person” rather than as a taxpayer, thereby avoiding income taxes.

To promote his natural per-son theory, he wrote books and created instructional DVDs, and Paradigm sold them through its website, www.naturalperson. com.

“If I make the decision and I go in that box, which person, in the eyes of the law, am I?” he asked the judge.

“Am I Russell Anthony Porisky in my inherent personality as a natural person, or am I a sovereign-granted personality?”

“You’re Mr. Porisky,” the judge replied.

“That’s fairly misleading because that’s not clear enough for me,” Porisky responded.

I’ve recieved this via an email today.

Media Release – For immediate release

Supreme Court judge errs in complex tax case (January 19, 2012)

VANCOUVER – Russ Porisky, charged with four tax-related offences, has been found guilty on three charges by Judge Elliott Myers in BC Supreme Court yesterday.

Drawing on 10 years of dedicated research on Canadian human rights, Porisky vigorously defended himself and his companion, Elaine Gould in a three-week trial. He is convicted on one count of income tax evasion, one count of failing to remit GST and one count of counseling others to commit an offence. The case, R. v. Porisky & Gould 2012 BCSC 67, charged the two as a partnership, a legal entity that is not a taxpayer under the Income Tax Act, and whose existence was never proven in court.

We are disappointed in the judgment, says Eric Ho, a legal researcher who has studied Poriskys and others material for more than eight years. I do not mean any disrespect, but the ruling once again includes errors and misquotes, just like many previous decisions that challenged the taxing authorities.

Ho further states, I hope that the thousands of supporters across Canada will pursue justice because our legal right to property is at risk. This ruling is just another in a long list of decisions by our courts to suppress our human right, and civic duty, to question the tax regime in Canada.

Some notable errors include, but are not limited to: ignoring Supreme Court of Canada decisions, and failing to explain why Porisky was required to collect GST; yet Porisky has been found guilty for not remitting GST. There are also at least ten misquotes in the written judgment.

Russ findings – that we have a right to private property – should not be controversial because the alternative is that we are all slaves with no private property rights. Those who have truly studied his material, including accountants, tax lawyers, and former CRA auditors find his conclusions reasonable. So why were these same accountants, tax lawyers and former auditors prohibited by the Court from testifying in Poriskys defence? says Ho.

Clearly, this is a highly complex matter that mustnt be judged by the public from media reports. All Canadians, especially tax professionals should examine this case closely. Aside from these professionals, Russ is arguably one of the most knowledgeable Canadians on the Income Tax Act. He has spent over 20,000 hours studying other acts, case law, authorities on how to interpret statutes, and our human rights regarding private property and liberty, says Ho.

Background and facts:


 licensed by the Attorney General of BC and taught Professional Development courses for the insurance industry, seminars for the Vancouver Police, and security seminars on television with the RCMP.

Porisky, as Paradigm Education Group, ceased operation in 2009 but the supporters continue to grow. Porisky started as PEG in 2002. His materials included a 200-page Intermediate and 600-page Advance Courses on Canadian human rights. Students across Canada and around the world – many of whom are professionals — began independent studies of the material and participated in active study groups that subjected Poriskys findings to intensive review, often spanning a hundred or more hours per student.

Hundreds, maybe thousands, including accountants, lawyers, engineers and other professionals have studied the material, with many participating in long term study groups. They were prohibited from testifying in Poriskys defence.

Porisky operated as Paradigm without an intent to profit.

The BC Partnership Act defines partnership as the relation which subsists between persons carrying on business in common with a view of profit

The Supreme Court of Canada in 2002 ruled what constitutes a source of income: an activity done with intent to profit.

Mountain Equipment Co-op, a non-profit, generated $261 million in revenue in 2010 and paid only .11% income tax because as a co-op it had no intent to profit.

Foundational to the school materials were verbatim sections of the Income Tax Act, Statistics Act, CPP Act, WCB Act, EI Act.

Private property rights is the exclusive jurisdiction of the provinces as per s.92(13) of the British North America Act of 1867 that formed Canada.

Deem is used over 3800 times in the Income Tax Act, and is defined on the Department of Justices web site as a fact different from what it is in reality

The Excise Tax Act states that there is no need to remit GST if that activity is carried on without a reasonable expectation of profit by a natural person

Media contact:
Eric Ho,
Eric Ho Legal Researcher, Canadian Rights Education Group, Skype: knosin


13 responses to “Which person, in the eyes of the law, am I? Russell Porisky asked the judge

  1. Greg

    2012-01-26 at 05:11

    I myself have been dealing with CRA and their agressive investigation of my affairs. It is a sad commentary to experience their absolute indifference to a person’s dignity, efforts to make a living, business, the employees I have who are trying to make a living, fair play and moral obligation to do right.
    CRA and their crown prosecutors are more than willing to resort to any tactic available as long as it wins them what they want. Lying to the court, misrepresenting facts, slander, brow beating and putting a victim of their audit in a financially compromised position all works to their benefit. Their attacks financially destitute individuals who end up having no choice but to defend themselves, while CRA has unlimited resources and time to squash the little bugs with the biggest boots they can find.
    My experience to date is that justice is a relevant term. Justice is CRA agents covering their asses, holding individuals to different standards than they would put up with, third rate accounting that no private sector business would accept or they would themselves, looking good to their bosses to justify their jobs and working on their tans while the machine grinds the individual and their families to dust.
    Someone needs to score a message to this agency, which is one step away from organized crime and their protection rackets.

    • Escapees Blog

      2012-01-26 at 08:03

      Hi Greg.
      I’m appalled at your treatment. It appears that TPTB (and their ‘useful idiots’) will try anything to squash the individual in their quest towards One Worls Order.
      Is there anything that I can do help you as another free human being maltreated by the state?

    • Greg

      2012-02-03 at 17:04

      The Vancouver Sun article re the Porsky trial has me unimpressed. I left a comment two times on the SUN comment section stating that a major point has been missed in the debate. They have not allowed my comment to post.

      What was my point? Specifically that the system is skewed towards CRA. I stated that they have all the time in the world to go through a person’s files and stuff, in my case 2 1/2 years. Then they have all the legal resources they want to squash whatever bug they see. I got a quote from a lawyer who said that I would need $300,000 to $350,000 to hire him. He’s won several CRA cases already, one where CRA had to pay over a million dollars to the bug they were tyring to squash in Victoria BC. But who has that kind of money to fight the Government? A person ends up if they can, putting more mortage on a house if they can and then paying it off for the next 25 years, supposedly with after tax dollars and interest for the rest of their lives. Even if the bug wins, because it’s a criminal trail, the bug is stuck with the legal bill for their defense. So a person can be wrongly and/or inappropriately charged and financially ruined without any compensation. Fair?

      The other option is legal aid. This burns me. I actually qualify for it, but the lawyers taking legal aid are only paid $85/hr rather than the normal $300/hr to $550/hr or more they would normally get. Then the lawyer only gets paid for actual court time and something ridiculous like 2 hrs prep time. So what kind of legal representation is that??? Tax law and/or human rights are very specialized. When a legal aid lawyer goes to court and has 6 appearances in a morning session for his clients who are up for drug charges or theft, he can get an hour for each client and piggy back while he sits waiting for the next call. They defend the same sorts of problems every day and don’t need to think too long or hard about representation, and as a result, can do ok on the bone the system throws them. Not in my case or in the case of other people dealing with taxation or human rights issues.

      CRA wants to send someone to jail for years for having the nerve to file their taxes in accordance with their honest understanding of the system and get the double jeopardy that no other arm of Government gets. A person can get a HUGE arbitrary fine AND be sent to jail. In all other “criminal”cases, it’s either one or the other, not BOTH.

      So my point that wasn’t posted in the SUN, which was limited to 1/5 the words of what I have here, is that the courts are not and the Crown lawyers are not winning because they’re right, but by default. A charged person cannot afford to hire a proper lawyer to fight Goliath, legal aid is a joke and individuals end up forced to self represent. There is one land mine after another in court and legal activities. It’s like running through a mine field against crown lawyers and CRA who know and will use every and any angle they can to win. There is zero sense of respect or fair play from these people. Porisky, myself and others and not idiots not paying our fair share of taxes, proven thus by judicial review. We’re dancing through a mine field with no metal detector and our hands tied behind our back. CRA victories are right up there with shooting fish in a barrel. They like to hold up their big trophy, but neglect to tell anyone the fish was in a 45 gallon drum.

  2. Adien

    2012-02-02 at 23:35

    A few years ago I had the pleasure of attending Paradigm classes and I learned a great deal of information that has really changed my perception of the reality that we live in and the world around us.
    I value Russ’ information and I support what he is doing even though I have a slightly different view and direction.
    If it wasn’t for me being introduced to the material that Russ teaches (almost 100% of it is derived from “law” and legal sources in use today) I’d been very unhappy by my own ignorance.
    Not too long ago, CRA took almost every scrap of personal belongings I had, including food, clothing, toiletries, pet food etc. to settle a $19,000 “debt” that I was paying down while at the same time disputing.
    They took everything, worth a retail total of over $90,000 but they gave me only $3,000 credit and then added more interest, effectively negating anything applied to the account.
    I no longer use my SIN, I don’t want their benefits, I will be giving back the SIN card, closing the account and I’ve very tempted to drop my citizen status.
    Not to mention, I am a veteran and have served overseas in the Canadian infantry.

  3. Greg

    2012-02-03 at 17:16

    I joined Paradigm myself because I saw that Russ had made sincere attempts to write the Government and get real clarification as to his understanding of the laws we need to comply with. He never got any. I see comments from people on the SUN artile or whatever about we should all listen to the accountants and the Paradigm people were willfully setting out to tax evade. In my case, I went to an accountant and asked him to review the material I had. He watched a tape for a couple of hours, fell asleep and went no further. I asked another accountant. I asked my book keeper and my wife and others to review the information I had but no one had any interest. So what makes an accountant’s or anyone elses opinion that relevant if they won’t put any effort into being educated themselves? I might as well go to the bar and ask someone sitting at the bar, because they’re no less qualified than an accountant or lawyer who doesn’t think beyond the basic what the system fed them 25 years ago in school.

  4. Larry

    2012-08-27 at 00:37

    I have been helped greatly by the Russ Porisky information. I am just a small fish, so maybe that keeps the heat off. But I am appalled that Russ and Elaine are in jail now – I just found out. As Russ points out, we have wonderful rights and a great structure to our Common Law. And formerly we just needed to know our rights, to be able to demand them. But a new page has been turned now, and the authorities have abandoned any shame at breaking the law
    and bullying whomever might stand out to guide others. Now they routinely deny us our right to the precedence of Common Law, as a flesh and blood man, over and above their Statute Law, that only applies to “persons”, that is artificial persons. Their deceptions are mind boggling. Some higher authority needs to lay down the law to these criminal henchmen, if there really are any gentlemen with guts at the top any more. It’s awfully quiet up there !
    In that vein, someone contacted the Provost Marshall at the Can. Dept. of National Defence, asking if indeed she had the duty, as I heard, to enforce a flesh and blood man’s right to Common Law. There was no answer from the Provost Marshall. Although I have heard that in the States, there has been some help for “sovereigns”, from that direction.
    Us truth and freedom people here in rural ontario, are not using our last names, as these were imposed on us 300 or more years ago, by the state, them claiming authority over us when they get us to answer to it. So don’t. Or say/write “of the family _______”.
    Also, we are signing “Under Reserve. Without Prejudice” and below that “by: and sign name.
    This puts us under Common Law. It seems to work.
    Also, I’ve been hearing that if our Common Law rights are offended, we can go to a justice of the peace, and file a criminal complaint, or a criminal information, about that, and the Common Law process is compelled to begin. We can remind officials that they are in treason if they violate their Oath of Office, to uphold the Law, meaning the Common Law. What is that ? a 14 year sentence ?
    Hooray for Escapees Blog ! from Larry.

    • Patrick V1.2

      2012-09-06 at 07:41

      When the judge asked him , when he was called, if he came to the stand and the judge asked what he had for breakfast (in hind site of course) I would reply Well your honor that was very amusing. Perhaps we could ask the Province of British Columbia what it had for breakfast or the CRA what it had for breakfast ? What did they have for breakfast ?? Now again I ask who are you claiming I am and what person are you asking me represent?

      These bastards are indeed breaking natural law and will pay the Price. There is no judge in natural law because it is irrefutable. Perhaps they will pass a law that gravity is not legal ? Good luck with that one . Just as good luck with causing innocents harm. The judgment is not appeal able.

      They have truly screwed themselves with this ruling. You will see.

  5. Patrick V1.2

    2012-09-06 at 08:03

    What we are witnessing is anarchy. I can see why they are so afraid. Their own images must terrify them. The law is indeed in their mouths. God help them.

  6. gabe

    2012-12-23 at 03:58

    I read, studied and listened to all of the material that Russ Porisky published. I don’t think that he belongs in jail.

  7. Xabre

    2014-03-01 at 02:21

    All who are awake know full well that paying income tax is wrong, its immoral and unethical, especially when back in 1974 Trudeau had us join the then G7 we got hoodwinked into joining the central banking system somewhere in Switzerland and ever since then we pay income tax. However that is only a partial fact, the real stinker here is that when, in 1933 all the free nations filed for international Bankruptcy, from the crash of 29, and to this day we as a nation are paying income tax to pay compound interest on a debt that will never ever be paid back. Because in 1933 the Rothschild’s the Rockefeller’s and the Morgan’s came in and bailed out the US, the UK and a myriad of other nations and for being so generous those nations would come up with a little piece of paper called the Birth Certificate which as you now know placed us all in servitude ,usury, and slavery to pay on a debt WE did NOT create.
    Look up colonel Edmund House advisor to president Woodrow Wilson. He as much as came right out and said how the Birth Certificate ,and Taxation would work in perpetuity to enslave the people of the US and now it standard practice all over the world.
    That is why the courts will break their owns laws in court ,over rule supreme court findings browbeat, cajole, threaten jail any and all who call them on their bogus BULLSHIT!!!
    WE are paying into a system that does NOT pay to service Canadians but to service JUST the interest, to pay the International Banking Cartels, the Uber Elite ,the oligarchy, and the NWO.
    I for one will be giving up my SIN and removing myself from their system and refusing their Benefits under Maritime Civil Law, Criminal Law, and will claim “Common Law ” Jurisdiction in any and all dealings with the Canadian government and their crony’s

    • Gabe

      2014-03-01 at 13:39

      Well said. I think most people know that they are running an extortion racket. It is best to just try and ignore them, defend yourself with your rights if you must and just be yourself. Justice shall prevail, humanity always goes through these cycles….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: