Feedback: Tomorrow another child will be stolen by the council

14 Jan

Further to an earlier post “Tomorrow another child will be stolen by the council”  (, Chris has got some feedback for us:

” The Judge decided to kick two of us out who were “not party to proceedings”.

Not before I made an application and told the Judge that we were there representing the Wider Public Interest, he then panicked, got up, to scuttle off, before he managed to leave the ‘room’. I declared that he was committing Treason, and that the ‘Trial’ did not meet with Article 6 standards of the Human Rights Act. If we were to leave because Article 6 declares that all hearings must be fair and available to the Public and if they are to be private then at least the first instance must be in Public.

What I did not address him on was the Common Law aspect, this was because he got up to leave as I was speaking to him. Under Common Law, which sits above all other Law the man’s right was to be tried before a Jury of his peers and not to be disinherited, which means that you cannot remove someones children in Law full stop, they have to give them away.

Forced Contracting is also Unlawful too.”

More info as it appears.


One response to “Feedback: Tomorrow another child will be stolen by the council

  1. celebrities

    2013-07-30 at 08:06

    Hey would you mind letting me know which web host you’re using? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different browsers
    and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most.
    Can you suggest a good hosting provider at a honest price?
    Cheers, I appreciate it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: