Birth (Settlement) Certificates

09 Jan

Very interesting Mr. “Bond”.



A Settlement Certificate, also known as a “Birth Certificate” since 1837, is an official document issued to validly recorded poor (paupers) granting them certain basic rights and entitlement to benefits in exchange for recognition of their status as being owned as “property” and lawful slaves, also known as indentured servants and bondsmen. A “settlement” therefore is equivalent to a voluntary slave plantation.

Origin of Settlement (Birth) Certificates

Under King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar advisers, the first poor laws were promulgated around 1535 coinciding with the first official mandate requiring uniform record keeping by all Church of England parishes of births, deaths and marriages. The poor were considered the responsibility of the “Church” including ensuring they had ample work and did not starve to death as they were considered by default the property of the church.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures which were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. Under the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, peasants required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord’s land was considered a “right”. As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or “paupers” swelled.

Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, the laws concerning the administration and care of the “poor” were refined through the Poor Law (1601) which introduced a basic set of “rights” for the poor as well as the introduction of two “Overseers of the Poor” (Guardian) in each Parish, elected at Easter and funded through the first levy (tax) through local rates (now called “council taxes”) on property owning rate payers.

Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined through the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However from the age of 7 upwards the child could have been apprenticed and gained a settlement for itself through called indentured service, or “voluntary slavery”. Also, the child could have obtained a settlement for itself by service by the time it was 16.

Under the “reforms” of the Settlement Act (1662) and Poor Relief Act (1662), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”. If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home.

According to the various settlement acts from the 17th Century onwards until the introduction of Birth Certificates, the issue of a Settlement Certificate was considered a privilege, not a right. If a peasant wanted to move, the home parish could choose to issue a Settlement Certificate which then effectively became an indemnity insurance to the new parish if the pauper was unable to earn a living. A settlement certificate was only valid if it bore the seals of the overseers of both parishes and that of the local Justices and was not transferable. This is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers or Peons) used today.

Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1723 a new law was passed called the Workhouse Test Act (1723) in which those who wished to claim benefits and relief as poor now had to enter a “workhouse” being essentially a prison for men, women and children to perform some set work. To ensure that all poor were accounted and could be identified, new laws were also introduced to force the Paupers to wear a ‘P’ on their right shoulders as a mark of their status. This is both the origin of the “P” still placed as a mark on modern passports and other “official” documents and the “P” worn by prisoners from the 20th Century.

Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773, followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801, English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance. The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today.

Because of the deliberate “legal” theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison. Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked “to death”.

Beginning in 1834, a number of historic changes were introduced to the record keeping of births, deaths and marriages, the issuance of documents and the management of the “poor”:

(i) In 1834, British Parliament introduced the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which reorganized Church of England parishes into unions which would then be responsible for the poor in their area and administered by a Board of Poor Law Guardians, also known as the Board of Guardians. The clerks of Magistrates Courts still hold the power of a Clerk of the Board of Guardians; and

(ii) In 1835, the Municipal Corporations Act (1835) was introduced which effectively standardized the corporate model for towns and boroughs including making the municipality with elected officials responsible for data collection and service administration; and

(iii) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes. Thus on 1 July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish/region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.

Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871, Public Health Act 1872 and Public Health Act 1875 created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894, the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”.

Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Birth Certificate as proof one is born on the land

One fundamental flaw that remains within the Settlement (Birth) Cerificate System for the Roman Cult and its agents remains the fact that a Settlement Certificate is proof that a man or woman must have been born on the land for the certifiate to have effect, regardless of convoluted subsequent presumptions of what the certificate actually represents. If a man or woman was not born on the land somewhere a certificate could not be issued. Therefore any rejection, or return of a Birth Certificate serves as perfected evidence that a man or woman was born on the land and support to any Affadavit of Truth concerning their immutable rights from the Divine Creator.

This built in “flaw” is offset through the treatment of men and women as land themselves, through the deliberate corruption of the definition of land to include all that has been born naturally or self-improved on the land. In other words, the sharp edge reason the system ultimately denies each citizen their share of the commonwealth is because they are considered “chattle” and mere creatures less than slaves.

Birth Certificates are not “extremely valuable” to the holder in whose name the certificate is issued

While it is true that Birth Certificates are considered valuable securities that are traded amongst the private international entities and the elite, the holder in whose name the certificate is issued does not have access to such value.

Instead, by holding the Birth Certificate, the man or woman essentially consent to being treated as a pauper or peon and the sole obligation of the elite to provide mere scraps so that the man or woman does not die of starvation or great illness.

As Settlement Certificates and later Birth Certificates are solely and purposefully designed to disenfranchise men and woman from their rightful inheritance through voluntary enslavement and admission to being “paupers”, the system of Birth Certificates is wholly without legitimacy, a global system of organized fraud and crime and without lawful effect.

DISCLAIMER: The information produced above is for education purposes only and does not purport to be an official ruling, decision or action. Nor should the information in anyway be construed as legal advice. The use of the information is at the discretion of the reader and no liability shall be accepted in the event of its use. Always seek the advice of educated, reputable and honorable scholars of law first, before any action involving the law.

Copyright © Euro-Union-Court.Org 2011. All Rights Reserved


19 responses to “Birth (Settlement) Certificates

  1. Sue

    2012-01-09 at 09:01

    This makes good historical sense.
    I am a researcher into private land ownership rights and I think the birth cert is a form of deed. There are an immense amount of types of deeds, all of which deal with the transfer of an interest, right or property.
    Now land is considered real property, but we must never forget that the origins of most of these laws are canon/ecclesiastical and biblically every man is created from earth and the breath of God.
    Therefore man is composed of real property.

  2. Sir Steve

    2014-02-13 at 19:11

    Having followed the link at the top of the article, I see the source-info came from the Frank O’Collins RELIGIOUS CULT website, One – that sells people FAKE legal documents !!!

    I now have serious doubts as to historical accuracy of the article.

    Can someone who is not a “One Heaven” CULT MEMBER please belay my doubts?

    • jody

      2016-10-19 at 13:20

      Were you able to access Franks site ? No ! All of franks sites have been hijacked and access denied . why ? I doubt it was because the information he was sharing was false ! that just aint how it works .

      • robbo

        2017-07-16 at 10:29

        I had contact with someone recently who told me One-Heaven etc was hijacked but they may be coming back soon. In what form I do not know. I have had contact with Frank in the past, but I still do not know how he got his info. He has said in the past that he used to work in the Australian parliament. We all have to do our own work, but need guidance on methods as the whole process is mired by language and we are vested/clothed in language from our ‘birth’ as we agree to be loyal. Legal means loyal and honour and when we break this code then the shit hits the fan. We just don’t know this as nobody told us. Be careful with father and mother as the suffix…-ther means Agent. This is factual as I have a particular English Dictionary from the past.

        Be careful with words like original as this is not the same as origin. Origin means first-copy. There seems to be NO REFERENCE to a creator in the English language only to the god of man=Trinity. Be aware that JESUS is the Saviour of Man ( whether you believe it or not) and jesus in JESUS CHRIST- is the Saviour of the World and is the 3rd person=himself SPOKEN OF…in Court. Christ means to be anointed and to come into a body-politic as part of a nation and in a legal way. See the Bible as a legal book.


        This is the meaning of God in the Trinity.

        I was watching a very interesting video given by a black guy in United States-seemd to be a christian meeting. He stated that the Bible was written in the 16 Century by 49 people including Shakespeare and Francis Bacon. You can access through a website given by a guy from The Moors.


    2017-05-21 at 17:22

    This article is a very badly garbled version of the truth. Settlement and birth certificates bear no relation to each other. The development of poor law is not understood and only rarely correct. Workhouses are misunderstood and the difference between private ones pre 1834 and Union workhouses after this is ignored. I could go on – but please, read a correct version of this, even Wikipedia being much better, and actual books but genuine historians better still. EVE McLAUGHLIN

    • robbo

      2017-09-26 at 08:36

      Okay! Eve,

      He/she who makes a claim bears the burden of proof. Please feel free to reference your claims. Why would the Poor Laws not be understood? Do you think those people who sit under the Executive authority of government make mistakes?

      Is Wikipedia reliable?

      All versions are just that….versions, versions and more versions……………………………What is a correct version?

  4. robbo

    2017-06-04 at 12:39

    Hi! Eve,

    With respect how can we trust Wikipedia. Do you know where we can get a better explanation of what was written on Franks website about BC. I have communicated with him in the past and have heard differing opinions about his work. I read a long dissertation about why not to believe his work, but I did not know his work had been hijacked as stated above- where is the evidence for this. Frank claims he used to work in the Australian Parliament. In England and Wales the biological parents enter the details of their ( it is not actually their baby in law as in English law a marriage includes( means) a void marriage. The baby is born illegitimate and has to come under the Legitimization Act 1926. I have all the info. The details entered on the Record Book ( this is not a certificate as I have the evidence from an official under FOI Act) is NOT for the Public and may be accessed through a Court ( Court of Record????) but for particular reasons. The Extract of this is the long form Entry of Birth and here the surname is NOT attached to the given names. I have analysed the Entry of Birth -each word in various law dictionaries and everything is very specific. Even the -ther suffix of Mother and Father means Agent in law. The Statutory Fee may be Ships Money. Everything relates to ships as does Register- all relates to Ships. If you watch YouTube videos by Bill Turner in New Zealand ( he teaches things in detail and I know him) you will see that what is registered on Birth Certificate ( not extract) is the placenta, however Bill does not provide why this is so. The placenta dies. Even Entry has a specific meaning. I have the original Act of Parliament for England and Wales 1836/37 and in it is stated that all BC must have a Seal or Stamp. Mine has not and I don’t know why. I think the Seal or stamp makes it private and therefore no one can access the ‘normal’ BC which are a Public Record and used by all and sundry to make money off what we think are our names. The BC is not to be used as Identification, but you have to know what Identification means and Bill explains this. You can put a lien on all your property but I have not as I do not fully comprehend all this stuff yet and one mistake may result in ending up in prison.

    If you look at Bill’s work our remedy lies in the Statute of Westminster Act 1275. I have checked with UK government and is still in force. I think it is a Common Law remedy. I personally think the Magna Carta is a distraction. The English law began on 3rd September 1189/84?? And the 1275 Act pulled in the beginning. It is said that the Vatican own England etc and the world in Unam Sanctum but a Guy I have contacted who used to work for Gordon Brown said is was just a historical doc. of little interest. He did admit to being a Freemason and told me that he witnessed the Pope paying homage to the woman who acts as Queen of GB. So all a bit murky.

    Please feel free to share any details if you are able to trust this contact.

  5. robbo

    2017-06-04 at 12:43

    The English law began on 3rd September 1189/85?. What is meant by this is the memorialized law- written down, and not immemorial law- customary law.

  6. Robert Nunyer

    2017-12-13 at 15:54

    “In England, a thing is said to be immemorial when it commenced before the reign of Edward II”, which, of course, is ridiculous.

    Regardless of what you might hear or read, the ONLY “immemorial law”, (i.e. law “whose beginning is not remembered”), is natural law. And, “what comes first in time, is best in law”.

    “The law of nature is superior in obligation to any other. It is binding in all countries and at all times. No human laws are valid if opposed to this, and all which are binding derive their authority either directly or indirectly from it.” ~ Institutes of American Law by John Bouvier, 1851, Part I, Title II, No. 9

    • Robin

      2017-12-14 at 00:13

      Hi! Robert,

      With respect, one has to understand what is meant by ”nature” and it is not what we all think. Nature has a relationship to the Holy Ghost. You see all that we see and all the words we use are designed to control others by some others. We are all ‘trapped’ in language…period…

      • Robert Nunyer

        2017-12-14 at 19:07

        If that is what you wish to believe, it is certainly you prerogative.

      • Robin

        2017-12-14 at 20:01

        Hi! Robert,

        We are all in this together and belief is belief is belief. It is ALL make believe from the day we are ‘conceived’. In the system we are ALL self-constituting individuals under International Law and subject to Law/Lie/Rest from that day in ‘conception’. The whole English language is make believe, but classic latin is somewhat different-however I am not an expert on this. If you ‘live’ in America go listen to one of your fellow countrymen called Mark Passio on Latin and Julius Caesar. But, of course, you may ‘live’ somewhere else.


    • Robin

      2017-12-14 at 08:51

      Hi! Robert

      The Holy Ghost was the former ( form means the appearance of a body) of the human nature of Christ in the womb: mat. I 18, ‘ She was found with child of the Holy Ghost; ‘ and ver. 20, ‘ that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost; ‘ which was in his forming and fitting that matter into a man, which prolific virtue useth to do.

      Ref. The work of the Holy Spirit in Our Salvation by Thomas Goodwin.

      It is difficult for us people to stand back and be what we understand to be objective about all this stuff as the Church has likely been running the show called ”the world” for the last 2000 years and even that Lawyer Bouvier is subjected to the nuances of just the English Language ( the English is NOT England), let alone even more codes. The word Law means to LIE -to Rest ( between the periods in time/speech and then appear in person. Person means to sound through). The judge will ask you to Rise. So here we have a horizontal position and a vertical position. Does this remind you of a crucifix?

      There can be NO such thing as the laws of nature inasmuch as we think this might relate to the wind, storms, the oceans. See my first paragraph and you will see what nature pertains to. Please remember that this is a game of control and one has to have a dictionary that guides one, NOT an Oxford English dictionary. I have a condensed form of the British Imperial dictionary and this shows the meanings of words as intended by those who want to rule under the English Re-formation. Most of English language it is vulgar latin and pertains to the land of fiction and we are punished for using most of this language. We are seen as self-constituting individuals in International law and have the same Standing as any country in the U.N. on earth. Most people just do not know this. I know it because I have studied it and I have the proof of this as written by a professor ( means confessor) of International Law. Being subjected to those in the private companies like United States or United Kingdom ( in a country or nation) is some other trick. We are controlled by the allegory of the Immaculate conception and we all become Born-again Christians under Christ, I have only discovered this in the last 2 days and now I comprehend what this means. You have to know the difference between Christ and christ. The Holy Spirit anointed Jesus and conceived of Him.

      • Jack MeHoff

        2018-02-14 at 21:32

        ” We are seen as self-constituting individuals in International law and have the same Standing as any country in the U.N. on earth. Most people just do not know this. I know it because I have studied it and I have the proof of this as written by a professor ( means confessor) of International Law.”

        can u please send me the work(s) of this professor?

  7. Sue Maynes

    2018-02-15 at 06:31

    Reply to Jack MeHoff – International Law accepts you are self-constitution individuals as follows:

    Each person is born with inherent free will – that is known as Private Law.

    The history of the UN documents that it is a body designed to bring peace to the entire world. The problem is each nation and tribe has its personal domestic laws, which can and do clash.

    So it separates the individual from the domestic law in this manner –
    * you are an individual held by birth or naturalization to a specific domestic law – in which is your jurisdiction for conflict.
    * as are other people, particularly those who reside in other foreign countries, under the domestic laws and jurisdictions of that other country.
    * Each of those countries now has governments that operate outside of the domestic jurisdiction in what is called Administrative Law – essentially workplace codes, regulations, rules, etc.
    * Administrative Law holds to Admiralty
    * You enter into a contract with a foreign national – the contract must include the jurisdiction that will adjudicate a contract dispute – otherwise there can be a stalemate.
    * That stalemate is called a “conflict of laws” Private International Law.
    * The UN has developed arbitral law, which is Admiralty – and a government in administration brings the UN arbitration rules into that particular country and gives it force of law.
    * In that country, YOU are coerced into entering agreements with that de facto government, which are registered in admiralty for dispute.
    * Your domestic laws have no voice in that situation – you have effectively stepped away from your home country into international waters in these individual / government registered agreements.

    You are now using your Private law free-will rights to decide your own future in a Private International world.

    Therein lies the planned One World Government.

    We all think it is a single body of unwanted people taking over our lives against our will – instead consider that it is a world where WE give all authority to those people to control us, through a structure of commercial law we have agreed to.

    The professor that may be the one you are after is Phillip Hamburger – Professor in law at Yale. To understand the history of Administrative law I hugely recommend his book ‘Is Administrative Law Unlawful?’ and i am about to start his newest book ‘The Administrative Threat.’

    I have been documenting this in a facebook group I run, since 2014, when my husband and I completed and had accepted, our reversions to the Cth of Aust. Shortly after we found the first trace of this admin process and have been learning about it since then.

    • Robin

      2018-02-19 at 06:51

      Hi! Sue,

      Would it be possible to contact you directly by email. We used to be in contact in the past. I live in NZ. I thought you had been ‘taken out’ by the PTB. I remember a land issue.

      I wanted to discuss the use of private as this appears to be the problem when we are Divided from the Church concept of Trinity or now used word-Confederacy. This latter term was used on the TV series The Crown. A confederacy ultimately means a league between groups/nations.

      I have studied the beginnings of ‘us’ from birth and with the help of Jack realized that we are all in penal servitude; which is what is meant by private when we get Divided for the (w)hole= the One/Unity. However, you seem much more up to date with how we are controlled today, but all ‘houses’ or households in the ‘objects’ case ( not ‘subjects’ case) must have a foundation and I feel I have deciphered the foundation of this and wanted to discuss this in the context of today.

      Also, I met a woman 5 years ago who was sent to NZ to study the Maori culture by the United Nations. She told me then that nothing gets done in U.N. unless given the okay by the Americans.


  8. Robin

    2018-02-19 at 07:00

    By the way Sue. .Individual:

    Respectfully, we have to be careful how this word is used as if interpreted in the context of a transitive or intransitive verb then it does not carry the same weight as if used as a noun. I think this is the way Judges use ‘interpretation ( the spirit of the law/equity) in court’.

    I do not know how we would overcome the way it it used, but I guess its always best to have the knowledge on the use of language or know how this word is used in the legal language of the jurisdiction one is in. My reference is in the context of traditional language- however – traditional language is another word for Nation, ie a Nation occupies a country through the use of language which then ‘delivers’ the baby into the body-politic of the born-again Christian into the concept of a state( of mind) the estate and the estate gets Divided up and plundered because the estate has already been paid forward by Jesus concept.


  9. MoorishNews

    2020-09-07 at 18:49

    Where is the verifiable documentation to substantiate this theory?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: